Skip to main content

Previous

Intoxication

Next

Involuntary manslaughter

landmarks in the common law

Oye (2013)

Insanity and self-defence

Jacqui de Silva examines a case that raises several issues with the defence of insanity

This column is relevant to understanding the legal profession: AQA AS Law 01; OCR AS Unit G151: English Legal System and WJEC LA2.

A classic principle of criminal responsibility is that a defendant should not be criminally responsible for an act if, at the time of committing the act, he or she did not possess the minimum level of sanity and self-control required for criminal liability. The unusual case of Oye (2013) raises questions concerning the relationship between the subjective and objective elements of self-defence when the defendant’s acts are carried out as a result of insane delusions.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Intoxication

Next

Involuntary manslaughter

Related articles: