Skip to main content

Previous

Replacing the Human Rights Act

Next

Balancing conflicting interests: dress codes and the law

Wrongful conviction?

The role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission

An understanding of the role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission will provide a broader context to your study of the appeal system, the judiciary and the criminal justice system as a whole. In terms of concepts and themes in law, a discussion of miscarriages of justice and the Criminal Cases Review Commission could be used to illustrate theories of justice and balancing interests

This article is relevant to AQA A2 Unit 4 (criminal law (offences against property) and tort, and concepts of law); and WJEC LA1 (understanding legal values, structures and processes).

In April 2016 the Court of Appeal set aside the rape conviction of footballer Ched Evans and ordered a retrial. The case was referred to the court by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) on the basis that there was fresh evidence not considered at the original trial. One month later the CCRC declined to refer the case of Eddie Gilfolye to the Court of Appeal despite a large volume of undisclosed evidence supporting his defence. Gilfoyle served 18 years for the murder of his wife before being released in 2010. He has always protested his innocence.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Replacing the Human Rights Act

Next

Balancing conflicting interests: dress codes and the law

Related articles: