Skip to main content

Previous

What is a human right?

Next

Psychiatric injury

law updates

Craig Beauman keeps you up to date with the latest developments in topics across the A-level law specifications

The appellant (A) and the respondent (B) were both antique dealers. Following a dispute, a large amount of debt became due from B to A. On 1 May 2010, a settlement was agreed, with B to pay A $1.5 million in ‘full and final settlement of all claims between the parties’ and a penalty clause was added that in the event of non-payment by 21 May 2010, B would pay $1,000 per day to A as a penalty.

Between 2010 and 2016, B made some payments towards the settlement sum, but not the full amount, invoking the interest that had been accumulating daily since 22 May. In 2014, B agreed to pay $800,000 to A, which B later argued discharged his outstanding liabilities from the original agreement.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

What is a human right?

Next

Psychiatric injury

Related articles: