Skip to main content

Previous

Frederick Seddon: mason, miser and murderer

Next

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948)

law updates

Craig Beauman keeps you informed of the latest developments in topics across the AS and A2 specifications

Is a Stormtrooper helmet a work of art or an element of production?
TOPFOTO

In this case the defendant, a propmaker, had been commissioned between 1974 and 1976 by the claimants to produce several prototype helmets to be worn by Stormtroopers in the movie Star Wars. His prototypes were approved and he made 50 helmets for use in the film.

In 2004 the defendant began making and selling versions of the helmets. The claimants successfully sued the defendant in the US courts for breaches of copyright. Their claims, however, were dismissed in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal. The claimants had argued that the helmets were examples of a ‘sculpture’ protected under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. In the High Court the judge disagreed, stating that the helmets were not sculptures, but instead a mixture of costume and prop, with their main function being utilitarian.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Frederick Seddon: mason, miser and murderer

Next

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948)

Related articles: