Skip to main content

Previous

Liability under the Animals Act 1971

Next

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893)

examination focus

Creativity continued...

Sally Russell continues her analysis of judicial creativity

Imagin/Cadmium

In the last issue we looked at how judges can display creativity in developing the common law. Now we will look at how judges can display creativity in developing statute law, using the same examination question, as follows:

Read the question carefully and try to pick out what the examiner is looking for. Do not be afraid to change the order of the question in your answer. Before you can evaluate something you need to explain it, so the best approach to this question is to take the three parts in Table 1 in reverse:

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Liability under the Animals Act 1971

Next

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893)

Related articles: