Skip to main content

Previous

Constitutional conventions

Next

The modern president: transformational leader or facilitator?

interview

Lord Davies of Stamford

Lord Davies answers questions from Ian Richards on how the Lords differs from the Commons, why he left the Conservative Party, what is wrong with the Tories and Labour’s record on the recession

Lord Davies speaking at a Labour Party Conference in Bournemouth
TopFoto

IR As a former MP and now a peer, how would you compare the two chambers?

LD The Lords is more ‘civilised’, less partisan and less confrontational. This has its good and its bad points. You do not get up to speak in the Lords — some people do, but it is not well received and is against the culture of the place — to make purely party political points, or to provide material for a press release. You only get up if you think you have something significant to say and you have done your homework on the subject. As a result, speeches and debates are much more instructive. I learn something new much more frequently than I did in the Commons, and, thanks to the cross-benchers, on a wider range of subjects.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Constitutional conventions

Next

The modern president: transformational leader or facilitator?

Related articles: