Skip to main content

Previous

Unhappily ever after: comparing Anne Brontë and Sam Baker

Next

THE HISTORY BOYS

The Mill on the Floss and its narrator

Cicely Palser Havely considers the limits of moral and biographical approaches to George Eliot’s novel and opens some questions about her gender-ambiguous narrator

AQA (A): Non-exam assessment: Recommended text (The Mill on the Floss)

Thanks to the long-lasting influence of the Cambridge critic F. R. Leavis, the moral content of George Eliot’s fiction is still sometimes regarded as its most important attribute. In The Great Tradition (1948) he nominated Jane Austen, George Eliot, Joseph Conrad and Henry James as the high points in a tradition of moral seriousness in fiction that enhanced ‘awareness of the possibilities of life’. That postwar date is important. Among the new uncertainties of the Cold War, the idea that authoritative moral illumination could be found in the finest realist fiction was compellingly relevant to many readers.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Unhappily ever after: comparing Anne Brontë and Sam Baker

Next

THE HISTORY BOYS

Related articles: