Skip to main content

Previous

Politics at Sheffield University: a student’s perspective

Next

The War Powers Act revisited

US update

The Supreme Court

Edward Ashbee explains why the Supreme Court sometimes makes decisions by not making decisions. He also looks at how President Obama has played fast and loose with the War Powers Act

The first same-sex marriage in Arlington County, Virginia on 6 October 2014, following the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear appeals brought by five states

In their coverage of the US Supreme Court, textbooks rightly focus on key rulings. Roe v Wade (1973), the judgement that established abortion as a constitutional right, is widely cited.

Paradoxically, however, the Supreme Court can sometimes make decisions by not making decisions. How can this be? While attention is focused on the nine judges sitting on the Supreme Court bench (the top tier), there are other, albeit lower and subordinate, federal courts. Currently there are:

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Politics at Sheffield University: a student’s perspective

Next

The War Powers Act revisited

Related articles: