Skip to main content

Previous

Maimonides’ philosophical writings

Next

Did Jesus marry Mary Magdalene?

stretch and challenge

Ethics and evolutionary theory

Can an ‘ought’ be derived from an ‘is’?

Peter Manning explores the perennial issue of whether a matter of fact can lead logically to a matter of value

The sociality of humanity is present in G. E. Moore’s notion of good

All exam boards: ethics options

As the American political philosopher Larry Arnhart shows in Darwinian Natural Right (1998, p. 72), David Hume argues that although politicians can persuade people to display moral sentiments of kindness and sympathy, this only succeeds because our ‘nature must furnish the materials, and give us some notion of moral distinctions’. Hume’s appeal to sympathy as a foundation for ethics founders, however, on his nominalism because it looks like special pleading. In other words, sympathy has no foundations apart from those an artificially constructed social contract might provide. Hume appeals to nature but has not worked out a basis upon which such nature might be known due to knowledge being little more than ‘habits of mind’.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Maimonides’ philosophical writings

Next

Did Jesus marry Mary Magdalene?

Related articles: